<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: does the Nikon D90 have color accent?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nikond90dx.com/nikon-d90/does-the-nikon-d90-have-color-accent/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nikond90dx.com/nikon-d90/does-the-nikon-d90-have-color-accent</link>
	<description>Nikon D90 DX &#124; Reviews &#124; Technical Info. &#124; Recommendations &#124; Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:44:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: selina_555</title>
		<link>http://www.nikond90dx.com/nikon-d90/does-the-nikon-d90-have-color-accent/comment-page-1#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>selina_555</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikond90dx.com/nikon-d90/does-the-nikon-d90-have-color-accent#comment-252</guid>
		<description>About the color accent option: it seems to be a current fad that people are getting excited about.
The camera keeps one color and turns everything else black and white.

I would never use such a feature for the following reasons:

• You are very limited in what you can do.
• The function isn&#039;t always reliable or accurate. The camera&#039;s idea of &quot;red&quot; might be different to yours. It will often include/exclude areas that don&#039;t want to be included/excluded.
• What if you just happened to take your best photo ever, but instead of having a real color photo, you only have some partial b&amp;w thing that might look totally awful. You&#039;d kick yourself.
• If you do the &quot;Selective or Partial Desaturation&quot; (as it is called correctly) in post processing, you have much more control over it, and will get a way better result. Plus you can keep your original color version, too.

This also applies to any color effects done in camera like b&amp;w or sepia - you&#039;re better off NOT to.

If you don&#039;t have your own image editor, you can go to www.picnik.com and use their effects menu which makes it very easy.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the color accent option: it seems to be a current fad that people are getting excited about.<br />
The camera keeps one color and turns everything else black and white.</p>
<p>I would never use such a feature for the following reasons:</p>
<p>• You are very limited in what you can do.<br />
• The function isn&#8217;t always reliable or accurate. The camera&#8217;s idea of &#8220;red&#8221; might be different to yours. It will often include/exclude areas that don&#8217;t want to be included/excluded.<br />
• What if you just happened to take your best photo ever, but instead of having a real color photo, you only have some partial b&#038;w thing that might look totally awful. You&#8217;d kick yourself.<br />
• If you do the &#8220;Selective or Partial Desaturation&#8221; (as it is called correctly) in post processing, you have much more control over it, and will get a way better result. Plus you can keep your original color version, too.</p>
<p>This also applies to any color effects done in camera like b&#038;w or sepia &#8211; you&#8217;re better off NOT to.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t have your own image editor, you can go to <a href="http://www.picnik.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.picnik.com</a> and use their effects menu which makes it very easy.<br />
<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
