http://www.ritzcamera.com/
http://www.adorama.com/
amazon, or calumet

Duration : 29 sec

Technorati Tags: western

Is it possible, in any way?
he should carry a fully-charged car inverter UPS or something! (200 watts will do?)
Is that called a car-inverter or a DC converter, where to buy, car accessories shop?
please show a link!
Thank you in anticipation!

My Brother’s going for a 11 day trek, and even with three batteries he’s a bit confused!

The battery on my Nikon D90 is amazing. To borrow a phrase, it just keeps on going and going. My closest similar experience was a 3 day shoot that I averaged about 100 pix a day. I didn’t drain the battery. If I had no way to charge batteries, I’d try to take about 6 batteries for an 11 day trek.

To conserve battery power, I’d shut off the automatic image review, p 163 in the menu. Also he will need to keep the batteries warm (inside pocket).

If this trek includes a vehicle, e.g. jeep, I’d take an inverter (converts car battery to AC) and my charger and the 3 batteries he has.

Maybe of equal importance is the number of memory cards he is taking. If he is taking a couple hundred photos a day in Fine + NEF, he will eat about 8GB a day, so he’ll need about 11 or 12 8GB cards.

Thanks for the email solicitation.

Duration : 3 min 1 sec

Technorati Tags: obaby

Duration : 5 min 33 sec

Technorati Tags: viliv

Duration : 33 sec

Technorati Tags: laptop

The first thing to realize is that almost any digital camera will take good pictures. If more people would read the manual more than once, they would be able to take better pictures. Usually, the person assumes it is the camera when it could be them not knowing exactly what to do. Just give yourself more photographic knowledge by doing more reading on the internet.

I really believe buying a camera is an individual choice.
The person needs to read alot of reviews on cameras so they can decide on the features that they really want and need.
Go to the store and hold them so you can see if they feel comfortable in your hands. If possible, take some pictures in the store to check the quality of the pictures.
I can only give a suggestion of what to look for in a new digital camera.
Good Luck

my suggestion
go to this link for help
http://reviews.cnet.com/digital-camera-buying-guide/

Duration : 4 min 48 sec

Technorati Tags: wacom

Duration : 6 min 4 sec

Technorati Tags: microsoft

I’m fairly new to photography and started buying Nikon because I got a good deal on a D90. Since then I’ve bought a few lenses (50mm 1.4, 18-200mm) a flash (Sb-800) and a few other accessories. If I was to switch to a full frame camera I wouldn’t be able to use these lenses anyways because they’re Dx lenses (from what I’ve read it cuts the quality in half when using them on an Fx camera?).

Should I cut my losses with Nikon and start building with Canon?

You will never be able to afford the D3x, huh?

Gee too bad. Actually the D3x is rarely used by professionals unless they do a lot of studio work and then the camera pays for itself in a very short time

THE Nikon to own if you are a working pro in the fields of sports, news and other places where high quality images are needed under less than excellent lighting is the D3 or new D3s.

You are thinking of "cutting your losses" and moving to Canon when many of the Canon users are moving to Nikon for the D3 and D3s advantages.

And yes, you seem to be comparing apples and oranges here. The direct competition the Canon 5D, Mark II is to the Nikon D700, NOT the D3x

See how they all compare

http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Compare-cameras/(appareil1)/341%7C0/(appareil2)/305%7C0/(appareil3)/296%7C0/(onglet)/0/(brand)/Nikon/(brand2)/Canon/(brand3)/Nikon

As you can see, the Nikon D700 out performs the more expensive Canon 5D, Mark II in the areas where it counts.

If you were to look further, you would also see that if you had some Canon EF-S lenses, you could not even use them on a Canon 5D at all. At least with the Nikkor lenses you can use them in the cropped mode on the D3 (I do this from time to time myself … the images are still professional quality and can be published in newspapers, magazines and posted on websites.

What exactly are you expecting from a digital camera? It may be that NO camera will meet your expectations.

You are far too new to photography to know what you need. Learn how to be a photographer over the next few years and then revisit your question. By then you will have matured enough as a photographer to really know what your needs are (vs. wants) and you will be able to make a good logical business decision on which camera system best suites your level of photography and the clients you are serving.

And for one last comparison, the high end Canon 1Ds, Mark III and new Canon 1D, Mark IV (not a full frame sensor) compared to the Nikon Dx

http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Compare-cameras/(appareil1)/342%7C0/(appareil2)/287%7C0/(appareil3)/291%7C0/(onglet)/0/(brand)/Canon/(brand2)/Nikon/(brand3)/Canon

As you can see, you are in the right camera system if you ultimately want the best of the best, but as a beginner, how would you know? If is clear that you have not been talking to pros who use their cameras daily to make a living.

When sitting on the hardwood floors at NBA games, for the most part, the Canon users have their cameras supplied by their employers. Those who own their equipment have Nikon systems … or wish they did when they are back in the media room chatting with Nikon users.

Take a look at the performance of the Nikon D3s and newest Canon 1D, Mark IV under low light conditions.

My guess is you have not dug this deep yet.

http://www.photographybay.com/2010/02/04/canon-1d-mark-iv-vs-nikon-d3s-iso-comparison/